[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > On Sunday 11 November 2001 09:12 pm, David Carlisle wrote: > > the advantage of foo.xml#bar over either of the above is that the #bar > > fragment id syntax is supported by a range of mime types. > > Like what? HTML and what others? Also, who actually uses it? Most of the > times I've ever seen ID attributes used in HTML is in the context of an > anchor. #bar is not part of the XML, it is part of the URI that is used to represent something within a resource. For example, VRML uses it to reference a prototype instance or a particular viewpoint in the world. For example http://www.3d.org/myhome.wrl#bath would reference the viewpoint in the bathroom. Here, all the ID attribute is nominating is a point that can be referenced from outside the document. (eg by another document) -- Justin Couch http://www.vlc.com.au/~justin/ Freelance Java Consultant http://www.yumetech.com/ Author, Java 3D FAQ Maintainer http://www.j3d.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Look through the lens, and the light breaks down into many lights. Turn it or move it, and a new set of arrangements appears... is it a single light or many lights, lights that one must know how to distinguish, recognise and appreciate? Is it one light with many frames or one frame for many lights?" -Subcomandante Marcos -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|