[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
> Like what? HTML and what others? pdf: http://www.tinaja.com/linkpdf1.html svg: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/linking.html#LinksIntoSVG probably some others i don't know, but the principle is the same, that the syntax after the # depends on the mime type of whatever is returned. > I've ever seen ID attributes used in HTML is in the context of an > anchor. Yes exactly that is the semantics of fragment ids in text/html, that's the whole point. If you request http://www.example.com/aaaa.xml#foo and what you get sent back is an HTML 2.0 file (because you are using Xmosaic 1.0) then #foo will be interpretted as an HTML fragment id and mosaic will scroll to the point marked <a name="foo"/> If on the other hand you request http://www.example.com/aaaa.xml#any-xml-specific-fragment-syntax then you will still get the same HTML file back but you can't make sense of the fragment id. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|