[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPath conformance? was RE: storing XML files
Mike Champion wrote: > Also, extension functions are defined in XSLT, not XPath, so neither adding > operators or functions to the XPath 1.0 spec is any more or less correct. The XPath evaluation context includes a function library, not an operator library (and the former implies no change to the grammar). This is an important distinction, but I'm ready to be done arguing about it :-) > If you want a "standard" query language for XML DBMS, wait until XQuery > comes out, (or get the XML world to agree that XSLT is "the" XML query > language, I don't care) then we can argue about each other's conformance. Agreed. Evan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|