[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Blueberry
Vincent-Olivier Arsenault wrote: > Well mmm, not enough I'd say : why is there a need for so many character > classes and DERIVATION rules (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#CharClasses)? Most of that is descriptional baggage. XML really only needs to characterize each character as: legal in names legal as the first character of a name not legal at all. I have a set of rules (which the Core WG has not yet considered) which do the Right Thing in Unicode terms, while remaining backward compatible, such that every XML 1.0 document can be changed to a Blueberry document just by affixing the Blueberry mark. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|