[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Blueberry
At 05:18 PM 6/21/01, John Cowan wrote: >Vincent-Olivier Arsenault wrote: > > >>Well mmm, not enough I'd say : why is there a need for so many character >>classes and DERIVATION rules (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#CharClasses)? > > >Most of that is descriptional baggage. XML really only needs >to characterize each character as: > > legal in names > legal as the first character of a name > not legal at all. I think that's a forward incompatible way of seeing things, why not, instead, think in terms of reserved characters and escape sequences (< &, etc.). Or better, having ABSOLUTELY (new) reserved characters and not bother about that at all (leave it ALL to UNICODE)! Yeah that's more complicated, yet it IS feasible with a reasonable level of cooperation from UNICODE (I'm sure they can manage that). v
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|