[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
On Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:11:41, Francis Norton wrote: >Steve Muench? wrote: >> <xsl:script> itself, allows *any* language's code, >> not just ecmascript and java. I consider separately >> the question of whether the XSL 1.1 WD should change >> to allow *only* >> >> <xsl:script language="qname-but-not-ncname"> >> >> instead of >> >> <xsl:script language="java | ecmascript | >> QName-but-not-NCName"> >> >> removing the two "shortcut/builtin" names. >> >I don't consider this a separate question - to me, it is the >single most obnoxious aspect of xsl:script. If you make this >change, what does compelling advantage does xsl:script offer >over community-based extensions such as exsl? Is this the best argument for removing <xsl:script> from XSLT: it isn't necessary? Less is more. In any case, it seems only right to treat all languages equally. take it easy, Charles Reitzel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|