[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] [Fwd: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT1.1]
I apologize for the confusion. I'll look into amending the petition text without disrupting anyone viewing or signing it. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:18:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...> To: xsl-list@l... CC: script Petitioners <no-xsl-script@c...> I'd like to point out, and possibly repair a factoid bug in the petition. > 7. With the new extension function language binding clauses > and recent changes to the DOM specification, it appears that > the W3C strongly favors Java and Javascript over other > equally qualified languages. We would prefer language > neutrality. In particular, the DOM specification had Java and ECMA Script bindings in the first version. Thus "recent changes" above is incorrect, this unfortunately (my fault) was not fixed ealier. IMHO, the above paragraph should read: > 7. With the new extension function language binding in XSLT 1.1 > draft and the Java and ECMA binding appendix of the DOM > specification, it appears that the W3C strongly favors Java and > Javascript over other equally qualified languages. We would prefer > language neutrality. Very sorry, Clark P.S. Uche, can we have a 'known bugs' section? *sigh* -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@f... +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|