[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Resource gloss
Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > I like XML Namespace Gloss. XNGloss, or whatever. We might slightly play down the dependency on XML Namespaces, what we really are describing are resource directories -- so in the interest being as direct as possible does anyone have a serious opposition to: Resource Directory Description > > > > > I hope Jonathan, Tim and Sean would have a few > > > spare cycles left as well > > > > You bet I have. I look forward to seeing this through 'till the time it > > ends up as a W3C Recommendation :-) > > Seriously, I think having <link><resource/></link> in a m12n family is the > > best way to go... and the details aren't all that hard to sort out: this > > thing kind of writes itself. > > Yes, I'm not saying this would be a titanic undertaking, but I do think it > needs a home and an authority. Probably not W3C. First of all, Paul > Grosso mentioned that this is an area where the W3C had thought maybe the > community could do some work. Secondly, it's probably too lightweight for > the W3C. More a SAX than a DOM (REC) or SOAP (NOTE). I would like to see this as an XML-DEV activity for the time being, at least until we have a fairly solid spec and some implementation code to go along. > Thirdly, I think > the Resource Gloss extensions to XHTML themselves should have an > "http://xml.org/..." namespace. Ideally, but at least I don't have write priviledge to xml.org. In the mean time we can host the activity on the http://www.openhealth.org/ site. > > And, hey, this is one case where no one > could call foul about the use of HTTP URI in an "official" NSRef. Right! Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|