[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Namespace or document gloss?
Dan Brickley wrote in another thread, > FWIW I'll be putting XHTML and RDF at most of my namespaces and > could really do with a vocabulary for pointing to Java classes, > XML schemata, public keys, XSLTs and suchlike to include > alongside. Many of the things Dan mentions here look as tho' they'd be equally appropriate as resouces related to a complete document instance ... so the association might be doc<->resources, not just namespace<->resources. I don't see any particular reason why that should affect the content of a gloss doc, but it pretty clearly means that using namespace URIs for making the association won't do the whole job. Thoughts? Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@i... http://www.interx.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|