[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft

  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 17:53:17 -0400

boundary for w3c.
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:

> I'd suggest that the W3C is trying to have it both ways - they won't subset
> XML, but heck, they'll subset the Infoset instead!

Sure looks that way.
 
> I'd suggest that's pretty arbitrary, and that your use of '74 whitespace
> properties' is basically a barricade to keep out any of the rest of the
> items in Appendix C.

Naah, I'm not that clever.  Lazy, maybe.
 
> You arbitrarily ruled it out of scope, the DOM folks arbitrarily ruled it
> out of scope, and now we have a lot of XML features that applications just
> plain can't get at easily.

There were no DTD parsers for far too long, so nobody really thought about
DTD models.  With the Wutka model, that has changed.

> And how exactly did base URIs creep back into scope, while DTD dropped?  I
> can't find 'base URI' anywhere in the XML 1.0 spec.  Just curious on that
> one.  (Schemas aren't in either XML 1.0 or namespaces, so I'm much less
> inclined to dispute that boundary.)

In order to understand URI references within documents, you need to know
the base URI in effect at the point where the URI reference appears.

> What I'm saying here is that 'best we can figure it' appears to be a purely
> political decision that has some significant consequences.

*shrug*.  It may look political to you.  To me, it looks like "what DOM and
SAX do, plus a little bit."
 
> I'd suggest that it's better to drop that decision making - and drop the
> Infoset entirely - than to continue the current approach.  Sorry for all
> the blood you've sweated, but that's what I feel quite strongly.

Feel free to urge the W3C not to issue an Infoset at this time, but don't
expect to get listened to.  That does not mean that *I* am not listening,
or even that the WG is not listening.  But even if we all resigned in a body,
*somebody* at the W3C would make sure *an* Infoset existed.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.