[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Common XML - Final Review Draft
At 04:12 PM 8/2/00 -0400, Schlesinger, John (CICG - Direct Markets) wrote: >I think this may be going a little too far, especially when I read in the >Common XML - Final Review Draft Specification, 27 July 2000: > >"Documents created using the core Common XML feature set should always >present the same information set when processed by a non-validating parser >that conforms to the XML 1.0 specification, and should present consistent >information in both namespace-aware and non-namespace aware environments." > >Of course, I could be making the mistake of equating 'information set' with >'Infoset' - but surely 'information set' is contained within the 'whole idea >of the Infoset' even if it isn't contained in 'Infoset'... I've already replied to this - see: http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-dev/22553 You might also enjoy Rick Jelliffe's reply: http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-dev/22557 I have no objects to subsetting XML. I do have objections to subsetting the abstract representation of XML without subsetting XML itself. Is the Infoset about XML 1.0+Namespaces, or is it about something else? I'd much prefer that it be about XML 1.0+Namespaces, unless the W3C wants to talk about Common XML. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|