[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: Which license?

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 20:31:55 -0800

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> If this is worth doing then the way I would propose to do it would
> be to tie the trademark to a test suite.

Which is what Sun is doing with its standard extensions; there's
at least one precedent beyond POSIX certification.

FWIW I'm more than willing to hear about issues people may have in
the SAX-1.0/XML-1.0 test harness I've written (on my XML page),
and would be interested in any enhancements folk have that can
promote SAX-2.0 conformance testing.

Fair notice:  those aren't the only standards that'll be involved
in such work.  And of course, since it's Open Source it can be used
without my active involvement too.  (Though I'd love to hear about
it before anyone starts!)

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Next by Date: A new Zvon tutorial - DTD
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Next by thread: Sterday morning mind games or News from Didier's lab
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread