[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: Which license?

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:25:56 -0800

At 02:08 PM 1/10/00 -0500, David Megginson wrote:

>I'll take this as a (very well-reasoned) vote for leaving SAX2 in the
>Public Domain, just like SAX1.  With SAX1, I made that decision rather
>autocratically (I just did it), but I'd like to hear a range of
>opinions before we commit to a license for SAX2.

Yes, quite convincing.  The real problem we'd like to solve is, we'd
like to try to prevent anyone who makes incompatible changes from still
claiming it to be "SAX" and using the org.xml.sax package name.  Right?

Is there anything in the way of licensing, trademark, or copyright
machinery that would be helpful? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Next by Date: Unicode confusion
• Previous by thread: Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread