[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Simple XML conformance
Peter Murray-Rust scripsit: > - tool threw a fatal error because <!DOCTYPE was missing The XML Rec does not forbid a parser to treat validation errors as fatal. > - REC-xml and DOM specify DTD but spec.dtd is not mounted Non-validating parsers that read DTDs are entitled to get upset if the DTD cannot be read. > - several tools regard the absence of a DTD as a fatal error (i.e. they > appear to be validating by default). Again, that behvaior is not forbidden. -- John Cowan cowan@c... I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|