[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:09:28 -0500

At 01:41 AM 1/17/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:

>PS: Simon, its even worse, you would have to pay 15 000$ to be a member. Ann
>what is your receipe to (a) pay only 5000$ or (b) get 15 000$ on shoe-string
>budget??

It's an annual fee, you don't have to write a $15K check. 

There's no "recipe" other than prioritization. We decided that W3C
participation was an important part of what we do, and therefore the budget
reflected that choice. The same goes for any other budget decision, if it's
important enough, you find a way to pay for it. The idea that a company has
to be bringing in mid to high 7 figures before you can afford it is just,
well, silly, IMO. 

Ann
---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by Date: Re: Simple XML conformance
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Costs of the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread