[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Alternatives to the W3C

• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:24:47 -0000

Brandt Dainow wrote,
> SUMMARY:
> IE 5= 46.6%
> IE 4= 23.2%
> NS 4= 25.8%
> NS 3= 01.5%
> REST= 02.9%

I still have a gut feeling that 46.6% is unrepresentatively 
high.

Incidentally, I gather that AOL have been mailing their
user base recently, notifying them that the next release of
the AOL browser will be Netscape rather than IE based. I
wonder what that switch will do to the stats ...

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                       Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect        5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)20 8817 4030               London, W6 0LJ, England
msabin@c...          http://www.cromwellmedia.com/


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
  • Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: Colin Muller <colin@d...>

• Prev by Date: Derivation by Restriction
• Next by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread