[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A processing instruction for robots

• From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 10:15:17 -0800

At 10:25 AM 12/6/99 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>
>Second thought: "and the index attribute must be first". This is nice
>for implementors, but is likely to clash with the expectations of
>users and the cost of more generality is very low for implementors.

I'm open to changing this, but I thought I would start
with the most strict version. The advantage of the strict
version is that it doesn't need to be parsed. The Desparate
Perl Hacker can do four regex compares for the four variants
and get back to work.

Maybe folks who've worked with authors on SGML systems have
some relevant experience. Is this too strict for folks that
aren't tamed by computers?

wunder
--
Walter R. Underwood
Senior Staff Engineer
Infoseek Software
GO Network, part of The Walt Disney Company
wunder@i...
http://software.infoseek.com/cce/ (my product)
http://www.best.com/~wunder/
1-408-543-6946

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A processing instruction for robots
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: A processing instruction for robots
    • From: "Robert Hanson" <rhanson@b...>

• References:
  • A processing instruction for robots
    • From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
  • Re: A processing instruction for robots
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by Date: Re: nestable C/C++ XML parser?
• Previous by thread: Re: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by thread: Re: A processing instruction for robots
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread