[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A processing instruction for robots
* Lars Marius Garshol | | Second thought: "and the index attribute must be first". This is | nice for implementors, but is likely to clash with the expectations | of users and the cost of more generality is very low for | implementors. * Walter Underwood | | I'm open to changing this, but I thought I would start with the most | strict version. The advantage of the strict version is that it | doesn't need to be parsed. The Desparate Perl Hacker can do four | regex compares for the four variants and get back to work. I think I agree with Robert Hanson here. It's so easy to parse even if the order is optional that I don't really see any point in fixing the order. (Note for example that "Associating stylesheets with ..." does not fix the order.) | Maybe folks who've worked with authors on SGML systems have | some relevant experience. Is this too strict for folks that | aren't tamed by computers? I'm not really qualified to answer this, so I'll pass. --Lars M. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|