[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 10:46:53 -0700

When I try to explain the W3C's structure to conference and tutorial 
audiences, sometimes I put it like this:

"We lock the engineers from Netscape & Microsoft & Sun & IBM & Adobe
 & everyone else in a room and keep them there until they work it out.  
 The idea is to keep the marketing droids from making trouble."

which glosses over a lot of the details and subtleties of the picture.
But is kind of how I think about the process. 

As a historical note, one big reason why Tim B-L and the guys were able 
to bootstrap the W3C back in '94 was the public self-destruction of the 
HTML3 process over in the IETF.  I wasn't there so I won't comment on it, 
but it's certainly an interesting story. -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: XML and Databases article
• Previous by thread: RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Next by thread: RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread