[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: DOM and Grove

• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 09:27:54 -0400

Hi Len,

These are words of wisdom Len. What we re-discover is that history repeats
itself and that sometimes (or should I say often) humanity is slow to learn
from its mistakes.

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@n...
http://www.netfolder.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xml-dev@i... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@i...]On Behalf Of
Len Bullard
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 1:36 PM
To: Paul Prescod
Cc: xml-dev@i...
Subject: Re: DOM and Grove


Correct.  Not just possible; it's happening.

This is precisely what the IETM community
faced in the late eighties and early nineties.  The
answer was to convert everything to HTML to get the
job done.  Now they have to convert again.  Every time
that is done, the costs recur and the information gets a
little more damaged.

While it is hard on some to understand
terms like "notation", it is vital to understand what
Paul is saying.  This is where everything stopped.
This where CALS broke down.  This is where the
war was lost and the shaky structure known as the
World Wide Web emerged a winner because no two
ISO committee heads could agree.

Study the history of CGM.  Look at the relentless
duplication of the effort of SGML for reasons I
still cannot fathom.  Note how SGML was blamed.
Look at what is happening
in other notations being invented today for graphics.
Note the deliberate duplication of effort spent trying
to keep separate syntaxes.  Note how XML is blamed.

Study groves.  Write the simplified explanations
if you need them.  You do need them.

len

>Paul Prescod wrote:
>
> The real reason groves were invented was
> to answer the question:
>
>  * what is the result of hyperlinking into an arbitrary media type?
>
> What are the properties of the abstract object returned? The grove
> answers that question: the object has properties such as "parent",
> (possibly null), "children" (possibly null), "containing entity" and so
> forth.
>
> You cannot build a sophisticated hypertext system without answering that
> question. This will become apparent after XLink, XPointer and RDF are
> implemented. We'll start to see many divergences of behavior when links
> are made into (e.g.) PDF, MPEGs, JPEGs and so forth. Over time we will
> need to develop a framework for describing the correct results of links
> in a generic way. Then we will reinvent groves.
>
> Or not... we could keep doing things in an ad hoc manner for ever I
> suppose. It would be expensive and inefficient but it is possible.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: DOM and Grove
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ANN: XML and Databases article
• Next by Date: RE: Groves, the next big thing (Re: ANN: XML and Databases article)
• Previous by thread: Re: DOM and Grove
• Next by thread: Re: DOM and Grove
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread