[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Architectural Forms Questions
Hi Folks, We have some beginner's questions on Architectural Forms. The motivation for this message is our interest in creation, discovery, sharing and reuse of mappings. - How powerful is the correspondence that you can express with Architectural Forms? Is it essentially limited to renaming and omission? - In addition to using Architectural Forms to express correspondences that are known a priori, could you use them to document mappings that are discovered "on-the-fly" by modifying a document or DTD after a mapping is discovered? - It appears to be the case that the correspondence between A and B must be documented in a way that keeps the mapping tightly coupled to either A or B. Are there any plans to represent the correspondence so that it is not tightly coupled to either A or B? - Is it a correct interpretation to say that Architectural Forms represent correspondence by overloading existing language constructs? - Given that subtyping and inheritance have been part of the primary XML "schema" proposals, is it likely that XML Architectural Forms will be overtaken by advances in the XML schema area? Thanks. /Roger xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|