[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
> This would force the use of fully qualified names and create > name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing > the classes being used. I'd vote for changing the package name rather than the class names because package names appear in fewer places in the code, and because few applications are likely to want to use the old classes and the new concurrently. And I'd vote for sax2 rather than open-, mod-, ex- etc because (a) it's obvious to everyone what it means, and (b) it avoids further debate when it comes to sax3. Mike Kay xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|