[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
John Cowan wrote: > Bill la Forge wrote: > > > This would force the use of fully qualified names and create > > name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing > > the classes being used. > > I suppose if you use "import org.xml.sax.*;" then you have > a problem, yes, because you can't just add "import org.xml.opensax.*;" > to it. But if you import individual class names it's no problem: > if you use opensax.Parser, you never need to refer to sax.Parser > any more, since it is subsumed. Without even considering the technical merit, this strikes me as a good way encourage unsuspecting programmers to introduce errors. I vote no. -- Ron Bourret xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|