[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Are notations dead, or just pining for the fjords? (was Re: SAX and dela
W. Eliot Kimber writes: > Of course, the use or non-use of entities and notations is a data > management choice that has to be made on a case-by-case > basis. There are certainly classes of document for which the > indirection of entities does not provide sufficient benefit to > justify the cost. But that isn't the case for all XML documents. > > So saying that entities and notations are non-starters is, I think, > a bit strong. Perhaps, but I'm speaking from a business perspective rather than a technical one. I have seen almost no use of notations and unparsed entities in any type of XML application (other than demos by a few old-guard SGML types like Eliot and me). It seems that SGML's logical structure has sold well to the XML world, but its physical structure is gathering dust on the shelf (what if we renamed external entities to "parser-side includes"?). All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|