[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML API specification
>There are possibly two questions here. Do we need to _pass the information_, >and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property). I suspect >that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will >satisfy everyone. My own simple experience is that I would actively use >the following: OK. I think this is good arguments for actually defining these classes, because people who want abstract groves can take these, and build groves out of them. >I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they >were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed >from Property anyway. Actually, from Node. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|