[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML API specification

• From: Peter@u... (Peter Murray-Rust)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:19:56 GMT

This is very helpful, thanks.

In message <199702271514.KAA24157@n...> gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol) writes:
[...]
> I think for XML, we should probably get more concrete. The question
> is how much more concrete? How much information *must* the API support?

There are possibly two questions here.  Do we need to _pass the information_,
and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property).  I suspect
that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
satisfy everyone.  My own simple experience is that I would actively use
the following:

> Do we *need* 
Element,     Y
Attribute,   Y
Comment,     N  (an XML processor _may_, but need not, pass these.
		where would they be attached?)
PI,          Y 
Header,      Y
DTD,         Y
MarkedSection,    N
EntityReference,  Possibly, when I get brave
Entity etc. etc?
> 

I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
from Property anyway.

	P.
-- 
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML API specification
    • From: gtn@e... (Gavin Nicol)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Next by Date: Re: XML API specification
• Previous by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Next by thread: Re: XML API specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread