|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Hanson [mailto:elh@c...] > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 5:02 PM > To: Bullard, Claude L (Len) > Cc: 'Michael Champion'; xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999 > > 1. There is no way to look up, discover and retrieve the > library of resources that support with a namespace-qualified element. > If you come across a piece of data, there may be hundreds of > supporting resources like XSL transformations, schemas, > xforms, text documentation, etc. We need a way to link the > resources to the data. This is the biggest problem with XML > today. I guess it worries me when people say that the problem with XML is that it doesn't do ENOUGH. Most of the problems I see stem from trying to do too much, too soon, and biting off more before the previous mouthful was chewed. That's just disagreeing that this is an *XML* problem, not saying that it's not a challenge that W3C might want to address or xml-dev argue about. (State it in haiku and we'll be happy to beat any subject to death <duck>). It seems more within the domain of the meta-architecture of the Web that the TAG wrestles with or the classic challenges of ontology and epistimology that the semantic web people westle with. Also, isn't the challenge of querying a distributed database without a central index at the bleeding edge of computer science? Or would some way of leveraging Google (or whatever) to find the location of the meta-information work for what you have in mind?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








