|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
james anderson wrote: > > while it is correct, that, in oop, the scope and extent of property > bindings relate to object boundaries and relations, the identity of the > name is not necessarily qualified by the class. there are other oop > forms for which the expressiveness of rdf is necessary. java is not the > only possibility. You are probably talking about all the OOP forms where also the type / element distinction in XML Schema makes sense. :-) > the "work-around" of "additional" namespaces is, well, the nature of the > namespaces which java, in particular, prescribes. if rdf were to enforce > these restrictions itself, then other oop forms wouldn't be serializable > at all. Can you give a relevant example of this kind of OOP? Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








