|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
while it is correct, that, in oop, the scope and extent of property bindings relate to object boundaries and relations, the identity of the name is not necessarily qualified by the class. there are other oop forms for which the expressiveness of rdf is necessary. java is not the only possibility. the "work-around" of "additional" namespaces is, well, the nature of the namespaces which java, in particular, prescribes. if rdf were to enforce these restrictions itself, then other oop forms wouldn't be serializable at all. Stefan Haustein wrote: > > ... > > In RDF schema, property names are global. In OOP, object > properties are local to the defining class/interface. > Thus, I would need to add the class name to the property > name in order to avoid possible problems with name > conflicst. I also could assign a new namespace to each > interface or class. But both alternatives make the RDF > code very ugly... > *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








