[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

FW: Why XML Over the Relational Model?

• From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• To: "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 12:20:24 -0800

>XML is not optimized for update, retrieval, searching or anything else. It
>is optimized for interchange, interchange and interchange. So the question
>of the best persistence model for high-volume systems seems to me to boil
>down to a) "what data structure is fastest" and b) "what is the most
>convenient programatically." In other words, what data structures support
>business processes and with what sort of performance.

Amen! Couldn't have said it better myself. Beware the temptation to think that "XML is all and all is XML". XML is a great standard interchange language. Java is a great portable applications language. Neither were intended to solve all problems. Remember that a standard mechanism for moving information between two points places NO restrictions on how the information is represented or managed within each point. There are thousands of man-years worth of effort and products in the persistence space, that should be leveraged, not replaced.

Jeff Sussna


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Reserved names and documentation
• Next by Date: Re: Reserved names and documentation
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by thread: Re: sub-documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread