[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: sub-documents

• From: "Juliane Harbarth" <jhb@s...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 14:38:40 -0000

I admit I am rather late in answering this message, i.e. it has
been posted 11.12.1998. But as far as I understood the 
archive no one else has answered it and so I'll give it a try.

If there is a structure A and an other structure B that may
occur as a part of A as well as on its own, one can model
A including it's part B in one DTD, i.e. "ainclb.dtd".
An instance of A that includes B looks like :
    <!DOCTYPE A PUBLIC "ainclb.dtd">
    <A> ... <B> ... </B> ... </A>

An instance of B not surrounded by A looks like :
    <!DOCTYPE B PUBLIC "ainclb.dtd">
    <B> ... </B>
 
Juliane Harbarth
Technical Consultant
Software AG Germany                               
mailto:jhb@s...
           
Tel +49 (0)6151 92 1147                   


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by Date: Re: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Previous by thread: Why XML Over the Relational Model?
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML Over the Relational Model? (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread