[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?

Subject: RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:32:59 +0100
efficient xslt kay
> We have been trying to determine whether using XSL:For-Each 
> is having an impact on the speed of our document publishing. 
> Some of my buddies don't want to use xsl:for-each because 
> they believe it causes the process to take a longer amount of 
> time than just doing a template match over and over. Is this 
> true or no? Is xsl:for-each a performance hog or does it and 
> template matching take the same amount of time?
> 
Measure it and see. The results will depend on which XSLT processor you
are using. My guess is that there will be very little difference. The
arguments against xsl:for-each are based on maintainability, not on
performance.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.