[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
Wendell wrote: >m:apply[factorof[not(preceding-sibling::*)]] >will be better than >m:apply[child::*[position()=1 and name()='factorof']] at first I didn't get your point on this one. I supposed on further consideration that it was right, although it seems like it would be mainly dependent on the order in which xpath is evaluated by the processor, I mean that a reasonably clever processor would evaluate [position()=1 and name()='factorof'] first and then from there look for any child::* which matched this, with the result that it would only check the first child to see if it had a name of factorof? Am I very wrong in this supposition? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|