[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What are the practical, negative consequences of thinkingt

• From: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>
• To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:41:23 -0500

Hi Folks,

Consider this XML:

<Book binding="hardcover"> <Title>Software Abstractions</Title>
<Author>Daniel Jackson</Author> </Book>

I often hear people say that attributes are metadata. For example,
@binding is metadata.

David Carlisle likes to remind me that there is nothing in the XML
specification which says that attributes are metadata. In fact, the
XML specification does not even use the word "metadata."

So when I hear people talking about attributes being metadata, I
channel David Carlisle and tell them that attributes are not
metadata.

But I'm thinking this is a lost cause. The belief that attributes are
metadata is too widespread.

Besides, what difference does it make if people think that attributes
are metadata? Can you give me a concrete, practical example showing
where bad things happen because someone thought that attributes are
metadata?

/Roger

• References:
  • What are the practical, negative consequences of thinking thatattributes are metadata?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>