[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Rick Jelliffe's article on XSLT 1.0 performance

• From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
• To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:48:23 +0000

> 
> Is small|medium|large too simple?
> 

One of my mantras these days is that where performance is concerned, the devil is always in the detail. Therefore almost any attempt to categorize workloads is going to have too few dimensions.

One could try and start by characterizing "publishing workflows" versus "message switching applications", but there are still many critical factors that distinguish workloads within these categories.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Rick Jelliffe's article on XSLT 1.0 performance
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Rick Jelliffe's article on XSLT 1.0 performance
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: Rick Jelliffe's article on XSLT 1.0 performance
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: Rick Jelliffe's article on XSLT 1.0 performance
    • From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>