[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A generic approach to XML design versus a hardcodedapproac
Yes, I actually have had to use something like this. It was pre-XML, when a document *had* to have a DTD but I needed to get arbitrary information from A to B without being able to actively maintain the intermediate format. Felt shame, cold, fear. Now in XML we just omit the DOCTYPE: X! It would have been <!ELEMENT element (atribute*, element*) > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com> wrote:
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|