[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Martin Fowler on Schemaless Data Structures

  • From: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
  • To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:58:16 +0100

Re:  Martin Fowler on Schemaless Data Structures
> On 2015 Apr 9, at 14:55, Christopher R. Maden <crism@maden.org> wrote:
> 
> History repeats itself...
> 
> <URL: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/1996Oct/0472.html >

That's a high-class discussion -- thank you for finding that (I always took a great deal of pleasure from the way the SGML world managed to combine practical instincts with sophisticated principle, and a wide range of intellectual reference with a generally excellent prose style).

Some gems from that thread are below.

Jon Bosak:
> The whole idea of XML is that any CS
> graduate can construct a parser for it from the BNF grammar set forth
> in the specification without knowing anything at all about SGML.

(Len Bullard added: "...in a week").

It might be worth reminding ourselves that XML was designed to be The Simple One.

David Durand:
> Pardon the philosophical note, but how else should one respond to
> syntaxt-definition discussions where the mind of God plays a significant
> role!

I don't think there's any answer to that.

Bill Smith:
> HTML users may in fact be oblivious to this debate - that is their gain. 
> However, they won't ignore the issue that HTML is not sufficient for their 
> needs. Solutions to their problems will be found, and they will look far more 
> like VisualBasic or JavaScript than any markup language we have devised.

This was in 1996.  That's what's termed a 'Successful Prediction'.

Sperberg-McQueen:
> It seems Charles and I agree in our instincts that it is, or could
> be.  It seems clear from the confused reactions of others that our
> instincts are wrong in this case:  the idea is simple, but the
> obvious way of expressing it conveys something other than that simple
> idea to many readers who ought, if possible, to be able to read the
> XML spec with comprehension, if not always with the highest pitch of
> aesthetic pleasure.  That's an argument against using the notion in
> the documentation.

I recognise that frustration ('why don't people _get_ it?!').  This is an object lesson in withdrawing a suggestion with dignity and style.

And I have a fondness for the XML spec, but even I think that 'the highest pitch of aesthetic pleasure' would still be found comfortably on the left hand side of the piano.

Goldfarb:
> O.K. It is now clear that in XML a document "without a DTD" means literally
> that, and not just "parsable without reference to  its DTD". I think this is
> unfortunate because I believe it will render XML a non-starter in the
> marketplace.

I think this comes under the heading of an 'unsuccessful prediction'.

All the best,

Norman


-- 
Norman Gray  :  http://nxg.me.uk
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.