[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
Michael, you wrote: "I was not intending to suggest that a systems architecture has to be based on XML in order to be considered "good"." And I did not intend to say that, neither, but I expressed myself unfortunately, writing: "XML representation can help to establish very clearly"; you probably read that as "XML representation of the architecture", whereas I meant "XML representation of
resources". But I have yet a question. You wrote: "uniformity of data model and systems architecture across a system". Q: Do you mean uniformity *within* the data model and *within* the realm of representations; OR do you mean also a uniformity which *spans* across the gap between data model and representations, enabling clear alignments. The latter, by the way, was what I attempted to
say (writing "establish the relationships between document content and system structure"). Hans-J��n Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> schrieb am 11:00 Freitag, 4.April 2014: On 4 Apr 2014, at 09:17, Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> wrote:
I was not intending to suggest that a systems architecture has to be based on XML in order to be considered "good". I do think that uniformity of data model and data representation across a system help enormously in ensuring the architectural coherence of the system, and an architecture based on end-to-end XML can help to achieve that goal. Michael Kay Saxonica
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|