[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Markup, an abstraction

  • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • To: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:57:42 +0100

Re:  Markup
What are you trying to achieve? How far do you intend to take your abstraction?

If you are trying to develop a general theory of information, then it's not clear to me that abstraction of markup languages is the best place to start. It might be better to start with some existing information theory and see how markup languages relate to it.

I would be quite interested to know how the "syntax and semantics" of genetic information relate to the classes of formal language that we know about in computer science. In fact, I'd be surprised if there aren't a few PhD theses that explore this. I think that doing such a study in relation to the overall theory of formal languages would be much more productive than doing it specifically in the context of markup languages, which are just one example of that class.

An interesting property of markup languages, and indeed of most "formal languages as used in computer science" is that they generally encode information as a one-dimensional sequence of symbols from some finite alphabet. It seems that this is a property also associated with genetic information. But information representations don't have to be one-dimensional, and we often resort to multi-dimensional representations (diagrams, tables, network data models, music notation) in order to make information more accessible. I guess all such representations can be serialized into a one-dimensional form (indeed, into multiple one-dimensional forms). It would be interesting to know whether biological encodings of information are intrinsically one-dimensional.

So I think there are some interesting avenues to be pursued here, but I think that in pursuing them, you will quickly leave the comfortable world of markup languages far behind and see them just as one not-very-interesting subset of formal languages in general.

Michael Kay
Saxonica


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.