[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: namespaces redux
> As much as I agree with you about the evil of QNames in content, I > don't really think it was the job of the Namespaces in XML spec to > prevent this. It was absolutely the job of the Namespaces in XML spec to get this right, and it failed dismally. Firstly, it got the layering wrong: naming is fundamental and can't be layered on top of the core as if it were an application. Secondly, it refused to describe an object model, and thus failed to make it clear whether prefixes were information-bearing or not (rather as XML itself failed to make it clear whether CDATA boundaries are information-bearing). Michael Kay Saxonica
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|