[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type

• From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
• To: Toby Considine <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:58:46 +0000

Hi Toby,

Thanks for your response. I don't think I understand your message.

I'm not talking about addressing within a document but between documents,
on the web, using URIs. 

I don't think XPath is in scope in other words.

Cheers,
Peter



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On 
> Behalf Of Toby Considine
> Sent: April 13, 2012 09:54
> To: 'Andrew Welch'; Rushforth, Peter
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE:  xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
> 
> If one were to go down this path, relative addressing, as in 
> xpath, would need to be in the mix.
> 
> I find that when I use these constructs, though, I confuse users.
> 
> 
> "If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" 
> - Peter Drucker
> 
> Toby Considine
> TC9, Inc
> TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar
> TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop
> U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid 
> Architecture Committee
> 
>   
> Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
> Phone: (919)619-2104
> http://www.tcnine.com/
> blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
> 
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>

• References:
  • xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
  • Re: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>