[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?

• From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
• To: "'David Carlisle'" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:33:57 -0500

Yes ... no doubt that works.
Although the real issue is more subtle (I don't want to bother the list with
the details).    But what's harder than the XSLT is the schema.
Defining a truly recursive schema with the same element names that take on
different meanings (and attributes and allowed children !) depending on
their depth is a tough one.  Local elements declarations can help, but when
the XML simply wasn't designed with schema in mind its not fun.

Anyway my whole point to this sub-thread was that sometimes (IMHO) use of
recursive structures can be (ab)use and should really be thought out better.


----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
dlee@calldei.com
http://www.xmlsh.org

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:31 AM
To: dlee@calldei.com
Cc: 'Andrew Welch'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re:  Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not
supported?


On 11/12/2011 17:12, David Lee wrote:
> match="block"
>
> match="block/block"
>
> match="block/block/block"
>
> ==============================
>
> Yes but try to that  for an arbitrary deep occurrence.


match="block[count(ancestor::block)=$n]"


probably works in practice, or if you really need to check that all the 
blocks are direct children of each other then

match="block[every $i in 1 to $n satisfies ancestor::*[$n]/self::block]

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

• References:
  • Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@gmail.com>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>