[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Namespaces 1.1
>> All this proposal does is take markup that's currently invalid and >> define a valid behaviour for it. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > So people would start having an expectation that parsers would accept > markup that they currently reject. This is just not a good argument. I do not write XSLT 2.0 code and expect that most XSLT parsers can deal with it. I don't write SOAP 1.2 expecting older implementations to understand me. I don't write HTML5 applications expecting older browsers and applications to work (or, IE<9). I don't even expect the latest word processor to be able to deal with my early 90's documents. You cannot refute anything based on what is an expectation, and one certainly should not stop progress because of it. Expectations are very different from what you get through defined versions. Put differently, I often pop align="center" into a quick HTML mashup, expecting it to work. But these days it doesn't. And I have to use my brain to re-adjust and do the right thing rather than relying on some expectation. And getting rid of the align attribute was definitely the right thing to do. Not sure why XML changes are regarded as so much more difficult than HTML or any other faster moving standard. It's all just versions. Regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|