[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Abstraction in Science, Mathematics, Software,and Mark

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
• Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:25:08 -0500

Costello, Roger L. scripsit:

> It is clearly a reusable thing. But I am not convinced that it is an
> abstraction because it is hardcoded to specific element names. What
> do you think?

"Abstract" and "concrete" are relative terms.  Compared to an actual
appliance, your XML is abstract indeed.  See the .sig  below.

-- 
Cash registers don't really add and subtract;           John Cowan
        they only grind their gears.                    cowan@ccil.org
But then they don't really grind their gears, either;   
        they only obey the laws of physics.  --Unknown

• References:
  • Abstraction in Science, Mathematics, Software, and Markup
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • RE: Abstraction in Science, Mathematics, Software, and Markup
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>