[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Redux
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:27:34 -0000 "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote: > I like the direction of this. I see a slight problem when you don't > want your marked up text to start with markup. i.e. you want: > > abstract: Here be <em>some</em> dragons > > Maybe you have to do: > > abstract: <Here be <em>some</em> dragons> > > and: > > abstract: <<para { style : "bold" }>Here be some dragons</para>> > > such that '<' denotes the start of a special kind of construct in the > same way that '{', '[', and '"' denote the start of special kinds of > construct. Or require that 'text' be contained in markup, as per xml 1.0? Doesn't sound onerous Pete? Why would you want it *not* to start with markup? But then looking at Mikes > { authors: [ > {name: "Michael Kay", affiliation: "Saxonica"}, > {name: "Liam Quin", affiliation: "W3C"} > ] > abstract: <para { style : "bold" }>Here be some dragons</para> > content: <section { numbers : [1,1,2] }><para>...</para></section> > } I'm not sure if content: is markup? I can see authors as a list.. Is content: wrapping <section/> Mike? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|