[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Redux, ws

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
• Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:45:56 +0000

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:40:38 +0000
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:

> On 17/02/2011 08:00, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > The white space issue
> >
> > How are each of the ws areas (___) to be treated?
> > What can be learned from XML 1.0?
> > Particularly between the docbook bold and italic?
> >
> 
> In the format I was proposing, whitespace within <Z>...</Z> is 
> significant, whitespace outside that is insignificant. This is a 
> consequence of using angle-bracket markup only for fragments of text, 
> not for structured data or metadata.
> 
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

I think that's what I was getting at. I called it parser ws
where you call it ws outside markup.

I think that is different from XML 1.0 isn't it?



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • XML Redux
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux, ws
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: XML Redux, ws
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>