[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Redux

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
• Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:56:23 -0500

Dave Pawson scripsit:

> do we need xsd:dateTime or would it be redundant?

Redundant, I think.

Richard Salz scripsit:

> I'd rather the type appear before the value, so that ^ isn't reserved as a 
> special character, but more importantly so that parsers can do 
> type-checking and -conversion while they get the value (as opposed to 
> reading the content as text and then converting).

I see the second point, but since there are only a few non-quoted
datatypes, none of which use ^ natively, I don't see the first.  ^
can't be part of a number or date or boolean or null.

-- 
LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy?      John Cowan
FOOL: All thy other titles              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
             thou hast given away:      cowan@ccil.org
      That thou wast born with.

• References:
  • XML Redux
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>