[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Question on XML Schema 1.1 [vc:maxVersion]
On 10/01/2011 22:29, Ramkumar Menon wrote: Sorry for the delay in responding to this. If you are interested in such questions, asking on the W3C schema-dev list would be a better way of getting information and feedback. > Gurus, > Two questions on the version control namespace in XML Schema 1.1. > a) Why did we chose to have maxVersion be exclusive of the value? > i.e. > <element name="Price" vc:minVersion="1.1" vc:maxVersion="2.4"/> > Its tricky for a person to read this as > "Price" element will be removed on pre-processing if we are using > XSD version 2.4. The rule was adopted so that you can say that you want your schema to work with all the 1.x releases but not with 2.0, without knowing how many 1.x releases there will be. (In practice, I'd be inclined to write vc:maxVersion="1.99999" as it seems clearer to the reader.) > b) Are we assuming that version numbers for XML Schema MUST be > decimals, now and later? Exposing terms such as minVersion and > maxVersion indicate so. > Yes. We thought it unlikely that W3C would depart from the practice of using decimal numbers as version numbers for the specification. If there were a primitive type for "Dewey-decimal" type numbering (1.5.7.2) then we might well have chosen it; but there isn't, and defining such a type for this specific purpose would be overkill. Michael Kay Saxonica
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|