[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: XML5
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > On 16/12/2010 21:24, Jirka Kosek wrote: >> >> Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >>> You get more proprietary extensibility with XML (which lets >>> enterprise vendors say they do XML to appear to use a standard while >>> they lock the customer in on the vocabulary level). However, people >>> really shouldn't be sending content using proprietary vocabularies on >>> the Web. > > So, let's say I want an application that plays music and shows it being > played, synchronized with an animation of the musical score. > > I would have said the most appropriate architecture for that is for the > server to serve MusicXML, and for a client-side application to do both the > aural rendition and the animated display. > > You're saying I "really shouldn't" be doing that. I don't understand why. > How would you do it? I would use the MusicXML markup in my document, and use a XSLT stylesheet to convert these tags at runtime into horrible code in Javascript. Then I would check whether the XML markup is used or not, and if it is used, then I would advocate for its native implementation in browsers. Typically, XSLTForms follows this philosophy.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|