[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
• To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:11:16 +0000

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:34:13 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:

> I wonder whether XInclude should be part of the base spec?

I'd be tempted, except I *could* view that as an application?
Should it be included as part of the base spec or left
to a processor, using xInclude syntax [before|during] the parse?

Comment from a parser writer?

> 
> Maybe Tim or some other XML 'elder' should get the xmllite.org domain
> name, put up a spec, and see how much traction it gets.  If it gets
> any take up it could be pushed back into the W3C.

See if it has any traction here first perhaps?

-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: BillClare3@aol.com
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>